Judge Royce C. Lamberth

Many of you are aware that American Grand Jury has a history with Judge Lamberth that goes back several months. Judge Lamberth has been served with both the Super Jury and Super Jury II Presentments.

The most important criminal charge listed in the Presentments is Obama’s “eligibility” fraud.

Obama is not a “natural born” citizen as REQUIRED by Article II, Section 1 of the Constitution:

No person except a “natural born” Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President..

Judge Lamberth’s very first Order ruled, “although Presentments are constitutionally permitted, there is no authority under the Rules of Criminal Procedure.. to accept one.” The Order was shortlived as American Grand Jury responded to Lamberth that the Rules of Criminal Procedure simply don’t apply to Constitutionl Grand Jury Presentments. The Judge backed off.

Judge Lamberth’s Second Order then granted leave to “file” the Presentments with the court and furthermore indicated that ONLY the Attorney General [meaning Eric Holder] could approve such a prosecution. At this point the Judge was really reaching. American Grand Jury answered with a firm response, “we don’t file Presentments, we serve them.” We have “served” Judge Lamberth’s court and it is now his responsiblity to hear the Presentments. We strongly challedged Judge Lamberth in his allegation that the Attorney General could intervene in such a prosecution. For the Attorney General to intervene would be tantamount to a serious “conflict of interest.”

So where do “we the people” now stand in regard to the Judge Lamberth’s court?

It has now been over two months and the Judge has refused to do anything. American Grand Jury submitted our Response to the Second Order and the Judge has yet to answer it. This is now a pure situation of stonewalling. “When in doubt, do nothing” must be what the court is thinking. At this point the Judge’s Oath to the People and the Constitution is significantly in question.

It is now necessary that we respond to the Judge in the form of a “letter of grievance.” We are requesting that the Judge quit ignoring the people and do his job.